• Home
  • Practice Areas
  • Attorneys
  • FAQs
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

Otus Law Group Blog

Honda Spare Tire Mislabeling Leads to Recall

Posted on: 02-3-2012 Posted in: car safety, product liability, Product Recall

Honda is stating that the spare tires installed in their Ridgeline vehicles between the dates of August 25, 2011 and November 29, 2011 do not match the information on the vehicle’s tire information placard.  As such, these tires are being recalled.

The years affected are the 2011 and 2012 models.  206 vehicles fall under the purview of the recall.

The mislabeling means that the vehicles fail to comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 110, which concerns vehicles tires and rims.  Because the label is incorrect, the tire may not be inflated correctly, increasing the risk of a crash.

A notification will be sent by Honda to owners.  Affected consumers can take their car into a dealer and if the problem is found it will be fixed by Honda for free by replacing either the information placard or the spare tire assembly itself.

As a car accident attorney in San Francisco, I know how critical every part of the vehicle is in ensuring a safe commute.  Consumers rely on every piece of equipment to function properly, and if even a single piece has a defect, it can be catastrophic.  As a San Francisco personal injury lawyer, I hope everyone who owns the vehicle in question gets the problem corrected before harm can be done.

Related posts:

  1. Honda Expands Recall Due To Faulty Airbags
  2. Undeclared Presence of Sulfites Leads to Tremella Recall

Free Case Consultation

Sending ...

Recent Settlements

  • $7,000,000
    Toxic Contamination Injury

    Plaintiff brought an action that involved land contamination. Plaintiff's property had been contaminated due to the business operations of an adjoining landowner. Plaintiff received a binding arbitration award in excess of $7,000,000.

  • $14,000,000
    Work Site Accident

    Plaintiff was involved in a work site accident. Plaintiff was injured when a slab of marble fell on him. Plaintiff was able to obtain a settlement for $14,000,000.

  • $3,000,000+
    Forklift Injury

    Plaintiff brought an action against a forklift manufacturer under the theory of negligent maintenance and inspection. Plaintiff suffered serious injuries to his leg. Defendant refused to make any settlement offers until the eve of trial. At that time, Defendant offered only $150,000 to settle the case. Plaintiff received a jury verdict in excess of $3,000,000.

Recent Posts

  • San Jose man found unconcious 7 days after auto accident
  • Avoid riding on these bicycles this summer, CPSC warns
  • Wildlife related auto accidents on the rise, study says
  • Skechers Settles for $40 Million Amid Charges of Deceptive Ads
  • NHTSA Proposes Mandatory Stability Controls in Buses and Trucks
Call 24 hours a day 7 days a week! 1-800-348-2777
Choose:
  • Roseville Car Accident Lawyer
  • Roseville Personal Injury Lawyer
  • Oakland Car Accident Lawyer
  • Oakland Personal Injury Lawyer
Choose:
  • San Francisco Car Accident Lawyer
  • San Francisco Personal Injury Lawyer
  • San Jose Car Accident Lawyer
  • San Jose Personal Injury Lawyer
More Areas:
  • Burlingame Car Accident Lawyer
  • Burlingame Personal Injury Lawyer
  • Sacramento Car Accident Lawyer
  • Sacramento Personal Injury Lawyer
© 2012 Law Firm SEO and Lawyer Web Design by Legal Marketing Advantage.
TwitterStumbleUponRedditDiggdel.icio.usFacebookLinkedIn