• Home
  • Practice Areas
  • Attorneys
  • FAQs
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

Otus Law Group Blog

Goverment and automakers debate distracted driving

Posted on: 03-12-2012 Posted in: distracted driving, News, Reckless Driving, Safety

The recent debate between a government safety agency and automakers offers more proof that distracted driving in any form is dangerous driving.

When the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration suggested last month that car manufacturers voluntarily restrict drivers from using dashboard-installed cell phone, texting, internet and other wireless devices while their motor vehicle is in motion, automakers suggested this would only encourage drivers to use their even more dangerous handheld devices. The NHTSA wants manufacturers to install technology in their vehicles that will automatically disable these distracting in-dash wireless devices once the car is shifted out of park. Though GPS devices would still give directions in a moving car, the driver would be unable to put in an address without stopping the car. Next year, the administration plans to call for technology restricting drivers from using handheld devices in a moving car, but automakers are suggesting both plans be initiated simultaneously to discourage drivers from reverting to their handheld cellphones.

According to car manufacturers, in-dash voice-operated devices are safer than their handheld counterparts, but hands-free technology can be just as distracting, according to experts. In 2010, more than 3,000 people were killed in automotive accidents involving distracted drivers, an NHTSA study estimates.

As a San Jose personal injury lawyer, I know all too well how much damage is caused when motorists take their eyes and minds off the road ahead. If you or a loved one has been hurt in an accident with a distracted driver, please don’t hesitate to contact an experienced San Jose auto accident attorney.

No related posts.

Free Case Consultation


Terms of Service/ Privacy Policy

Recent Settlements

  • $7,000,000
    Toxic Contamination Injury

    Plaintiff brought an action that involved land contamination. Plaintiff's property had been contaminated due to the business operations of an adjoining landowner. Plaintiff received a binding arbitration award in excess of $7,000,000.

  • $14,000,000
    Work Site Accident

    Plaintiff was involved in a work site accident. Plaintiff was injured when a slab of marble fell on him. Plaintiff was able to obtain a settlement for $14,000,000.

  • $3,000,000+
    Forklift Injury

    Plaintiff brought an action against a forklift manufacturer under the theory of negligent maintenance and inspection. Plaintiff suffered serious injuries to his leg. Defendant refused to make any settlement offers until the eve of trial. At that time, Defendant offered only $150,000 to settle the case. Plaintiff received a jury verdict in excess of $3,000,000.

Recent Posts

  • Big Rig Overturns As A Result Of Two-Vehicle Collision
  • Campaign in California Focuses on Truck and Car Safety
  • Some Law Enforcement Agencies Having Vehicles Converted To Run On Propane
  • Fall Hazard Prompts Children’s Bed Recall
  • Child And Car Safety Seat Concerns Brought Up By The AAA
Call 24 hours a day 7 days a week! 1-800-348-2777
Areas We Serve:
  • Roseville
  • Oakland
 
  • San Francisco
  • San Jose
 
  • Burlingame
  • Sacramento
© 2012 Law Firm SEO and Lawyer Web Design by Legal Marketing Advantage.
TwitterStumbleUponRedditDiggdel.icio.usFacebookLinkedIn