• Home
  • Practice Areas
  • Attorneys
  • FAQs
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

Otus Law Group Blog

Sonic Toothbrushes Recalled Due to Shock and Fire Hazard

Posted on: 05-7-2012 Posted in: News, product liability, Product Recall

A recall has been announced for a toothbrush that could pose a hazard to the person using the item.

The models that this recall applies to are Spinbrush Rechargeable SONIC toothbrushes that were distributed by the Church & Dwight Company.  These defective items were available to consumers all across the United States and Canada between February 2010 and October of last year.

These units contain a charging base that has the potential to overheat.  If this happens, the user can expect localized melting and sparking to take place.  This kind of defect could lead to a serious fire or shock hazard.  Thankfully, though, there has yet to be a report of an injury taking place, but there have been seven incidents reported.

Affected consumers should be on the lookout for products with lot numbers between DD9310 and 9365, as well as DD0002 and 0122.  Persons with this item in their possession are being advised to immediately discontinue using the product.  They can get a refund by returning their items to Church & Dwight.  It should be noted that simple battery charged toothbrushes that don’t utilize an electric charging base do not fall within the purview of the recall.

As a Roseville personal injury attorney, it saddens me to see any item pose a hazard.  But when it’s an item as simple as a toothbrush, it really opens your eyes to see that any product could be dangerous if it’s defective.  I hope as a personal injury lawyer in San Francisco that nobody takes this recall lightly.

No related posts.

Free Case Consultation


Terms of Service/ Privacy Policy

Recent Settlements

  • $7,000,000
    Toxic Contamination Injury

    Plaintiff brought an action that involved land contamination. Plaintiff's property had been contaminated due to the business operations of an adjoining landowner. Plaintiff received a binding arbitration award in excess of $7,000,000.

  • $14,000,000
    Work Site Accident

    Plaintiff was involved in a work site accident. Plaintiff was injured when a slab of marble fell on him. Plaintiff was able to obtain a settlement for $14,000,000.

  • $3,000,000+
    Forklift Injury

    Plaintiff brought an action against a forklift manufacturer under the theory of negligent maintenance and inspection. Plaintiff suffered serious injuries to his leg. Defendant refused to make any settlement offers until the eve of trial. At that time, Defendant offered only $150,000 to settle the case. Plaintiff received a jury verdict in excess of $3,000,000.

Recent Posts

  • Kovatch Emergency Vehicles Could Pose Crash Risk, NHTSA Reports
  • Fuel Leak Prompts Coach Bus Recall
  • Microwave Popcorn Maker Recalled, Over 20 Complaints Registered
  • CPSC Reports: Anywhere Lounger Bean Bag Chairs Recalled
  • Deezo Jackets Recalled, Products Are Designed For Children
Call 24 hours a day 7 days a week! 1-800-348-2777
Areas We Serve:
  • Roseville
  • Oakland
 
  • San Francisco
  • San Jose
 
  • Burlingame
  • Sacramento
© 2012 Law Firm SEO and Lawyer Web Design by Legal Marketing Advantage.
TwitterStumbleUponRedditDiggdel.icio.usFacebookLinkedIn