• Home
  • Practice Areas
  • Attorneys
  • FAQs
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

Otus Law Group Blog

Audi’s mirrorless rearview not street legal, headed for the race track

Posted on: 06-1-2012 Posted in: car technology, Safety

The futuristic concept cars automakers display at auto shows commonly omit a standard safety feature: the rearview mirror. Digital cameras and displays meant to replace rear and side view mirrors have become a standard innovation in high end concept cars, despite the fact that the United States government has not yet accepted any such safety feature for public roadways. Audi has begun using the technology in race cars, which are exempt from the federal safety requirements set forth for consumer passenger vehicles. The automaker’s most recent prototype for its R18 Le Mans racing car has been outfitted with a digital rear facing video camera, protected by carbon fiber housing and attached to the vehicle’s rear tail fin. The camera, linked to an active matrix organic light emitting diode (AMOLED) screen, allows for a view of the vehicle’s rear despite the fact that the vehicle’s design requires the driver to sit inside of a cockpit that is completely closed off from the outside except for its windshield. The centrally located engine blue print for the R18 Le Mans racing car has no space to accommodate a rear window, so the new Audi prototype would offer Le Mans drivers their first glimpse of the road behind them.  Safety guidelines mandated by the United States Department of Transportation and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration do not currently allow carmakers to manufacture vehicles with digital displays instead of the required mirrors for use on state highways and city streets.

 

No related posts.

Free Case Consultation


Terms of Service/ Privacy Policy

Recent Settlements

  • $7,000,000
    Toxic Contamination Injury

    Plaintiff brought an action that involved land contamination. Plaintiff's property had been contaminated due to the business operations of an adjoining landowner. Plaintiff received a binding arbitration award in excess of $7,000,000.

  • $14,000,000
    Work Site Accident

    Plaintiff was involved in a work site accident. Plaintiff was injured when a slab of marble fell on him. Plaintiff was able to obtain a settlement for $14,000,000.

  • $3,000,000+
    Forklift Injury

    Plaintiff brought an action against a forklift manufacturer under the theory of negligent maintenance and inspection. Plaintiff suffered serious injuries to his leg. Defendant refused to make any settlement offers until the eve of trial. At that time, Defendant offered only $150,000 to settle the case. Plaintiff received a jury verdict in excess of $3,000,000.

Recent Posts

  • DUI Patrols On the Lookout for Intoxicated Drivers During Holiday
  • Car Safety Seat Check to Be Held in June
  • If the Child Sleeps with Parents, SIDS Risks Rise
  • Trailers Manufactured by Gulf Stream Coach Recalled
  • John Evans Manufacturing Recalls Cheetah Chassis, Trailers
Call 24 hours a day 7 days a week! 1-800-348-2777
Areas We Serve:
  • Roseville
  • Oakland
 
  • San Francisco
  • San Jose
 
  • Burlingame
  • Sacramento
© 2012 Law Firm SEO and Lawyer Web Design by Legal Marketing Advantage.
TwitterStumbleUponRedditDiggdel.icio.usFacebookLinkedIn