• Home
  • Practice Areas
  • Attorneys
  • FAQs
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

Otus Law Group Blog

Flushmate III recalled due to impact and laceration hazards

Posted on: 06-21-2012 Posted in: News, product liability

More than two million Flushmate III Pressure-Assisted Flushing Systems have been voluntarily recalled due to spontaneous tank shattering that can pose a laceration or impact hazard, according to an official recall notice posted on the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission’s website. More than three hundred tanks, manufactured by Flushmate, of New Hudson, Michigan, a division of Sloan Valve Company have burst and there have been fourteen reported injuries so far. Series 503 Flushmate III Pressure Assist flushing systems, manufactured in the United States from October 1997 to February 2008, installed inside various models of toilet tanks are included in this recall. The recalled systems were manufactured . The two-piece units are black rectangular vessels made of injection molded plastic. The date code/serial number is 16 characters long and is located on the label on the top of the Flushmate III. The first six numerals of the serial number are the date code. The date code range for this recall begins with 101497 (October 14, 1997) and continues through 022908 (February 29, 2008). These units were sold to toilet manufacturers including American Standard, Crane, Eljer, Gerber, Kohler, Mansfield and St. Thomas and to Home Depot and Lowe’s stores, as well as distributors and plumbing contractors nationwide for an average price of $108. Consumers in possession of this product should discontinue its use immediately  and turn off any water supply going to the Flushmate III. It is illegal to resell this product for any value under United States law.

No related posts.

Free Case Consultation


Terms of Service/ Privacy Policy

Recent Settlements

  • $7,000,000
    Toxic Contamination Injury

    Plaintiff brought an action that involved land contamination. Plaintiff's property had been contaminated due to the business operations of an adjoining landowner. Plaintiff received a binding arbitration award in excess of $7,000,000.

  • $14,000,000
    Work Site Accident

    Plaintiff was involved in a work site accident. Plaintiff was injured when a slab of marble fell on him. Plaintiff was able to obtain a settlement for $14,000,000.

  • $3,000,000+
    Forklift Injury

    Plaintiff brought an action against a forklift manufacturer under the theory of negligent maintenance and inspection. Plaintiff suffered serious injuries to his leg. Defendant refused to make any settlement offers until the eve of trial. At that time, Defendant offered only $150,000 to settle the case. Plaintiff received a jury verdict in excess of $3,000,000.

Recent Posts

  • Summer Is Almost Here: Keep Your Yard Safe for Your Children
  • More Compounded Products Recalled, Illnesses Reported
  • Impel, Dash CF Emergency Vehicles Recalled
  • Affordable New Autonomous Vehicle Technology Developed by Mobileye
  • Sweepers That Run on Alternative Fuels Have Been Recalled
Call 24 hours a day 7 days a week! 1-800-348-2777
Areas We Serve:
  • Roseville
  • Oakland
 
  • San Francisco
  • San Jose
 
  • Burlingame
  • Sacramento
© 2012 Law Firm SEO and Lawyer Web Design by Legal Marketing Advantage.
TwitterStumbleUponRedditDiggdel.icio.usFacebookLinkedIn