• Home
  • Practice Areas
  • Attorneys
  • FAQs
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

Otus Law Group Blog

Seattle-bound flight makes emergency landing after electrical failure

Posted on: 08-9-2012 Posted in: News, Safety

A plane traveling from California to Washington State was forced to make an emergency landing in San Jose recently because of a malfunction in the electrical system. The Alaska Airlines flight — bound for Seattle, Washington, from Ontario, California – had just taken off when the plane’s air to ground sensor failed, requiring the pilots to fly the plane manually when the auto throttle became disconnected among numerous other electrical system malfunctions.

The plane’s pilots announced an emergency situation, which required them to depressurize the plane themselves, but the plane’s oxygen masks – designed to deploy automatically when the cabin begins to lose air pressure — never dropped from their overhead storage compartments. Passengers in the plane report overhearing flight attendants commenting to one another about the severity of the situation before the cabin’s backup pressurization system became automatically activated. The flight landed safely in San Jose with no reported injuries.

No related posts.

Free Case Consultation


Terms of Service/ Privacy Policy

Recent Settlements

  • $7,000,000
    Toxic Contamination Injury

    Plaintiff brought an action that involved land contamination. Plaintiff's property had been contaminated due to the business operations of an adjoining landowner. Plaintiff received a binding arbitration award in excess of $7,000,000.

  • $14,000,000
    Work Site Accident

    Plaintiff was involved in a work site accident. Plaintiff was injured when a slab of marble fell on him. Plaintiff was able to obtain a settlement for $14,000,000.

  • $3,000,000+
    Forklift Injury

    Plaintiff brought an action against a forklift manufacturer under the theory of negligent maintenance and inspection. Plaintiff suffered serious injuries to his leg. Defendant refused to make any settlement offers until the eve of trial. At that time, Defendant offered only $150,000 to settle the case. Plaintiff received a jury verdict in excess of $3,000,000.

Recent Posts

  • Summer Is Almost Here: Keep Your Yard Safe for Your Children
  • More Compounded Products Recalled, Illnesses Reported
  • Impel, Dash CF Emergency Vehicles Recalled
  • Affordable New Autonomous Vehicle Technology Developed by Mobileye
  • Sweepers That Run on Alternative Fuels Have Been Recalled
Call 24 hours a day 7 days a week! 1-800-348-2777
Areas We Serve:
  • Roseville
  • Oakland
 
  • San Francisco
  • San Jose
 
  • Burlingame
  • Sacramento
© 2012 Law Firm SEO and Lawyer Web Design by Legal Marketing Advantage.
TwitterStumbleUponRedditDiggdel.icio.usFacebookLinkedIn