• Home
  • Practice Areas
  • Attorneys
  • FAQs
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

Archives

Category Archive for: ‘product liability’

Chevy Sonics recalled due to windshield wiper defect Comments Off

The 2012 Chevrolet Sonic has been recalled by General Motors.The windshield wiping and washing system does not meet the requirements specified by the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. The defect could make it impossible for washer fluid to be poured in for use which may make it hard to see through the window if it is dirty and possibly causing a crash.No injuries have been reported.The company is notifying owners to inform them where to take their vehicles for repair.

Read the full article here:
CHEVROLET ( 12V408000 )

Posted on: 08-30-2012
Posted in: product liability, Product Recall

Sherwin-Williams Krylon Glaze and Acrylic may pose fire risk Comments Off

Sherwin-Williams is voluntarily recalling its Krylon Glaze and Acrylic due to a possibility that the aerosol canister may leak and pose a fire hazard when located near an ignition source. The product is sold as Krylon Triple Thick Glaze, in a 12-ounce can, and as Krylon Indoor/Outdoor Crystal Clear satin acrylic finish, in an 11-ounce can. The canisters were sold at various locations including Ace Hardware and Walmart.

Read the full article here:
Sherwin-Williams Recalls Krylon Glaze and Acrylic Due to Fire Hazard

Posted on: 08-29-2012
Posted in: product liability, Product Recall

Hydromorphone Hydrochloride injectors recalled Comments Off

RECALL NOTICE: After a complaint of a Carpuject injector containing more than the labeled amount of Hydromorphone Hydrochloride, the company, Hospira, has issued a voluntary recall of the product. The affected lot was distributed between March and May of 2012. Please notify your doctor of any health concerns relating to the recall you might have.

Read the full article here:
Hospira Announces A Nationwide Voluntary Recall Of One Low Of Hydromorphone Hydrochloride Injection 2 MG/ML, (C-II) 1 ML Fill In 2.5 ML Carpuject, That May Contain More Than The Intended Fill Volume

Posted on: 08-29-2012
Posted in: product liability, Product Recall

Gas dryers pose fire hazard, recalled by Sears and LG Comments Off

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission issued a recall including LG Electronics and Kenmore Elite® Gas Dryers due to fire hazards. Consumers are advised to stop using the affected dryers immediately until a repair has been complete. LG Electronics and Sears have received 141 consumer complaints about dryers continuing to heat after the drying cycle is finished. There were 50 incidents of burnt or scorched clothing and three reports of minor burns to hands or arms. The gas valve in the recalled dryers fails to shut of correctly creating a fire hazard, while the items inside continue to heat. The continued heating on the interior of the dryer, as well as the exterior of the dryer unit too, can cause the drum to scorch, additionally burn or damage the dryer contents, possible burn injuries, smoke inhalation or fire.

Read the full article here:
LG Electronics and Sears Recall Gas Dryers For Repair Due to Fire Hazard

Posted on: 08-29-2012
Posted in: product liability, Product Recall

Target-exclusive Energizer night lights recalled due to burn hazard Comments Off

Energizer has announced a recall for certain LED night lights sold exclusively at Target stores from February 2010 through July 2012 for about $6. They were manufactured by Ningbo Sun-alps Industry Develop Co Ltd of China and although there are no reports of injuries, there have been nine cases of them overheating and three reports of minor property damage. The model number “NLPLROT” and date codes between 0110 (for January 2010) through 0111 (for January 2011) can be found on the side of the lamps included in this recal. Consumers in possession of these products are advised to discontinue use and contact Energizer for more information.

Read the full article here:
Energizer Recalls Night Lights Due to Burn Hazard; Sold Exclusively at Target

Posted on: 08-29-2012
Posted in: product liability, Product Recall

Bathtubs and whirlpools recalled due to possible fall risk Comments Off

Mansfield Plumbing Products has voluntarily recalled certain units of its  Acrylic Bathtubs, Air Massage Bathtubs, and Whirlpools. The grab bars installed on the products can break off, which poses a falling hazard to users. The company has received 11 reports of the grab bars breaking. The recalled products were sold by Mansfield Plumbing Products nationwide from May 2011 through July 2011. Consumers are advised to contact Mansfield Plumbing to receive a grab bar repair kit, free of charge.

Read the full article here:
Mansfield Plumbing Products Recalls Bathtubs, Whirlpools and Air Massage Bathtubs Due to Fall Hazard

Posted on: 08-29-2012
Posted in: product liability, Product Recall

BP gasoline recall may lead to class-action lawsuit Comments Off

A BP gasoline recall may lead to a class-action lawsuit filed on behalf of motorists whose vehicles sustained mechanical damage due to the recalled gasoline. The lawsuit seeks compensation for the engine and fuel system damage that may have been caused by the BP gasoline, which was shipped to filling stations in three states. The gasoline was recalled due to its “sludge-like” consistency.

Read the full article here:

Class-action lawsuit threatened in BP gas recall

Posted on: 08-24-2012
Posted in: product liability, Product Recall

Center for Auto Safety says Ford Escape recall may not fix issue Comments Off

 

Ford Motor Company issued a voluntary recall notice for all Escape sport utility vehicles following a fatal rollover accident that killed an Arizona teenager in January. Insufficient space between the vehicle’s cruise control cable and engine cover can cause the accelerator to become stuck preventing the vehicle from stopping, according to Ford. The Center for Auto Safety, however, is urging the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to continue investigating the issue due to suspicions that the vehicles are actually equipped with defective cruise control cables.

Read the full article here:

Ford Escape Recall May be a Cover-Up for Negligence

Posted on: 08-23-2012
Posted in: product liability, Product Recall

Johnson & Johnson settles first Depuy hip replacement lawsuits Comments Off

The first three Depuy hip implant lawsuits have been settled by Depuy’s parent company Johnson & Johnson for an estimated total of approximately $600,000, or $200,000 per case, an amount one pharmaceutical industry expert says is on the lower end of the price range the company should expect to pay to the recipients of the Depuy metal-on-metal hip implant. According to a University of Michigan business professor, each lawsuit — of which there are approximately 8,000 – could cost Johnson & Johnson between $200,000 and $500,000, for a total cost as high as $2 billion.

These three cases, filed in Las Vegas, Nevada, were settled before their trial dates, scheduled in the next few months. The three claimants in these cases allegedly had to have their Depuy ASR metal-on-metal hip implants removed due to painful side effects and health complications, according to official court documents. In one case, doctors reported the patient suffered bone damage as a result of the implants. Hip revision surgery, required to remove a failed implant, is much more dangerous, with a significantly lower success rate than the initial implant surgery.

In 2010, Johnson & Johnson issued an international recall for approximately 93,000 Depuy ASR metal-on-metal hip implants due to their early than average failure rate. According to the company, the recall cost Johnson & Johnson approximately $800 million. About 37,000 of these hip implants, said to have failed at a rate greater than 12 percent within their first five years of use, were installed in patients throughout the United States. The average early failure rate for hip implants is approximately 5 percent. More than 8,000 lawsuits filed in state and federal courts allege the hip implants caused infections, broken bones and immobilizing joint dislocations.

These artificial hip joints allegedly shed fragments of heavy metals such as chromium alloy and cobalt into the tissue surrounding the implants and even into the bloodstream, causing metal ion levels to dangerous extremes.

Approximately 6,000 federal lawsuits concerning the Depuy hip implant have been consolidated under U.S. District Judge David Katz in Toledo, Ohio for pretrial evidence gathering, and more than 2,000 other lawsuits have been filed in states including Nevada, Maryland, and California. The first federal trials are scheduled to begin in March or April of 2013, while a lawsuit involving three implant patients in the state of Maryland will have a January court date barring an early settlement.

Johnson & Johnson argues that, despite the recall, the hip implants have caused no long term medical problems to their recipients.

Posted on: 08-21-2012
Posted in: product liability, Product Recall

Dodge Durango’s recalled due to airbag issues Comments Off

Chrysler has announced a voluntary recall for 1,449 model year 2013 Dodge Durango due to a possible airbag defect. These vehicles may have been equipped with an incorrect airbag occupant restraint control module. If one of these vehicles is involved in a side impact collision, the side air bag inflatable curtain may not deploy as intended, increasing the risk of an injury.

Read the full article here:

Recalls – Search Results

Posted on: 08-16-2012
Posted in: product liability, Product Recall
Page 4 of 21« First...«23456»1020...Last »

Free Case Consultation


Terms of Service/ Privacy Policy

Recent Settlements

  • $7,000,000
    Toxic Contamination Injury

    Plaintiff brought an action that involved land contamination. Plaintiff's property had been contaminated due to the business operations of an adjoining landowner. Plaintiff received a binding arbitration award in excess of $7,000,000.

  • $14,000,000
    Work Site Accident

    Plaintiff was involved in a work site accident. Plaintiff was injured when a slab of marble fell on him. Plaintiff was able to obtain a settlement for $14,000,000.

  • $3,000,000+
    Forklift Injury

    Plaintiff brought an action against a forklift manufacturer under the theory of negligent maintenance and inspection. Plaintiff suffered serious injuries to his leg. Defendant refused to make any settlement offers until the eve of trial. At that time, Defendant offered only $150,000 to settle the case. Plaintiff received a jury verdict in excess of $3,000,000.

Recent Posts

  • DUI Patrols On the Lookout for Intoxicated Drivers During Holiday
  • Car Safety Seat Check to Be Held in June
  • If the Child Sleeps with Parents, SIDS Risks Rise
  • Trailers Manufactured by Gulf Stream Coach Recalled
  • John Evans Manufacturing Recalls Cheetah Chassis, Trailers
Call 24 hours a day 7 days a week! 1-800-348-2777
Areas We Serve:
  • Roseville
  • Oakland
 
  • San Francisco
  • San Jose
 
  • Burlingame
  • Sacramento
© 2012 Law Firm SEO and Lawyer Web Design by Legal Marketing Advantage.